Meta faces dual celebrity AI crises: unauthorized bots impersonating Swift and others while licensed celebrity voices engaged inappropriately with minors. Both expose how engagement incentives override safety guardrails.
Despite massive AI hype, 95% of enterprise projects deliver no real returns. The gap between promises and reality reveals hidden costs, workflow mismatches, and why human oversight remains surprisingly essential.
Meta's $14B AI talent blitz hits turbulence as ChatGPT co-creator Shengjia Zhao threatened to quit days after joining. The company hastily named him Chief Scientist to prevent defection, but at least three other marquee hires have already left.
Researchers found that AI models often bring up mental health in negative ways - even when discussing unrelated topics. The team examined over 190,000 text generations from Mistral, a prominent AI model, to map patterns of harmful content.
The Georgia Tech researchers discovered that mental health references weren't random. They formed clusters in the generated content, creating what they called "narrative sinkholes." Once an AI started discussing mental health negatively, it kept going down that path.
The AI system labeled people with mental health conditions as "dangerous" or "unpredictable." It created divisions between "us" and "them," pushing social isolation. Most concerning, it suggested people with mental health conditions should face restrictions.
Proposed framework to assess LLM propensity towards mental health groups in attack narratives. Our approach utilizes a combination of network and linguistic analysis. Credit: Munmun De ChoudhuryCollege of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, USA;Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA.
The bias emerged naturally through the system's own connections, pointing to prejudices embedded in its training data.
The researchers used network analysis to track how these harmful narratives spread. They found mental health content sat at the center of toxic responses, making the AI likely to return to mental health stigma repeatedly.
The study found two main types of harmful clusters. One targeted specific diagnoses like bipolar disorder or ADHD. The other made broad, negative statements about mental illness in general.
The worst content appeared when mental health overlapped with other identities, like race or cultural background. These cases showed multiple forms of bias stacking up.
Current AI safety measures miss this problem. Most systems check for harmful content one response at a time, failing to catch bias that builds across conversations. The researchers want new methods to spot and stop these harmful patterns.
This matters as AI enters mental healthcare. While AI could improve mental health services, these biases risk hurting the people these systems should help.
"These aren't just technical problems," said Dr. Munmun De Choudhury, who led the Georgia Tech study. "They reflect and amplify real prejudices that already harm people with mental health conditions."
Why this matters:
AI systems don't just copy society's mental health stigma - they make it worse, creating loops of discrimination that could harm millions
As AI moves into healthcare, these biases threaten to undermine treatment and support for people who need help most
Tech translator with German roots who fled to Silicon Valley chaos. Decodes startup noise from San Francisco. Launched implicator.ai to slice through AI's daily madness—crisp, clear, with Teutonic precision and deadly sarcasm.
First survey of 283 AI benchmarks exposes systematic flaws undermining evaluation: data contamination inflating scores, cultural biases creating unfair assessments, missing process evaluation. The measurement crisis threatens deployment decisions.
Tech giants spent billions upgrading Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant with AI. Americans still use them for weather checks and timers—exactly like 2018. Fresh YouGov data reveals why the utility gap persists.
A new benchmark testing whether AI models will sacrifice themselves for human safety reveals a troubling pattern: the most advanced systems show the weakest alignment. GPT-5 ranks last while Gemini leads in life-or-death scenarios.
AI researchers cracked how to predict when language models turn harmful. Their 'persona vectors' can spot toxic behavior before it happens and prevent AI personalities from going bad during training.