Cameron's Meta partnership signals a bigger shift in entertainment. As box office craters and production costs soar, two camps emerge around AI: enhancement vs disruption. The winner determines if Hollywood adapts or gets replaced.
Good Morning from San Francisco, Nvidia just handed Intel $5 billion. Yes, you read that right. The chip king propped
Nvidia invests $5B in struggling Intel for joint chip development—a power reversal that would've seemed impossible three years ago. Intel gets cash and validation; Nvidia gets x86 access without foundry risk. AMD faces pressure on two fronts.
In a twist that would make economists cringe, America's latest trade policy looks like it came straight from ChatGPT. The Trump administration's new tariff calculations match what AI language models suggest when asked about trade policy.
Economists and AI researchers worldwide have noted the striking similarity to AI-generated solutions. In a New York Times podcast with Ezra Klein, Nobel laureate Paul Krugman added his analysis.
"This is more a cautionary tale about AI than economics," Krugman told Klein. The formula takes a country's trade deficit with America, divides it by imports, then cuts that number in half. Ask ChatGPT how to set tariffs, and you'll get nearly identical math.
The implications stun economists. Different countries face different tariff rates - the EU pays more than Britain. This creates an immediate problem: Companies can ship goods through low-tariff countries to dodge higher rates.
Markets hate the uncertainty. Manufacturing stocks dropped despite theoretical benefits from protectionism. Investors see what AI missed - disrupting supply chains hurts American companies that rely on international trade.
Klein pressed Krugman on why this matters. The Nobel winner explained that language models simply repeat what they find online. They can't evaluate real-world consequences or spot logical flaws.
The policy creates unprecedented confusion. Previous trade disputes followed economic logic. But when AI formulas replace human judgment, no one can predict what happens next.
Europe faces higher tariffs than Britain. Mexico pays more than Canada. Bangladesh gets hit harder than Vietnam. The numbers follow AI's math but ignore economic reality.
This marks a shift in how governments make decisions. When leaders want backup for predetermined choices, AI offers ready-made formulas that sound smart but lack wisdom.
The irony cuts deep. An administration pushing "America First" may have outsourced trade policy to artificial intelligence. The result threatens both U.S. manufacturing and international relationships.
Why this matters:
Read on, my dear:
NYT Podcast: What Trump’s Tariffs Will Actually Do | The Ezra Klein Show
Anthropic builds classified AI models for intelligence agencies while blocking FBI and ICE from domestic surveillance use. The contradiction has sparked White House tensions and raises questions about ethical lines in government AI.
Google's £5bn UK AI investment drops hours before Trump's state visit, transforming routine infrastructure into geopolitical theater. The strategic timing reveals how American tech giants are rebuilding Europe's digital backbone.
China announced Nvidia violated antitrust law precisely as US-China trade talks resumed in Madrid. Beijing's regulatory timing exposes the impossible bind facing tech giants caught between competing sovereign demands over AI chip access.
Albania just appointed the world's first AI government minister to handle all public procurement. Diella promises corruption-free contracts as the country races toward EU membership by 2027. But can algorithms resist human manipulation?
Get the 5-minute Silicon Valley AI briefing, every weekday morning — free.
