Moonshot AI said Thursday that it had launched Kimi K3, a model built with 2.8 trillion total parameters. K3 is available now through Moonshot’s products and API. Full weights remain unavailable; Moonshot has scheduled their release for July 27.
What Changed
- Moonshot launched Kimi K3 with 2.8 trillion parameters, native vision and a one-million-token context window.
- The hosted model is available now, but full weights are not due until July 27.
- Vendor benchmarks look competitive, while differing harnesses and early reports of slow reasoning limit direct comparisons.
- API prices run from $0.30 for cache-hit input to $15 for output per million tokens.
AI-generated summary, reviewed by an editor. More on our AI guidelines.
Moonshot activates 16 of 896 experts
K3 combines native vision with a one-million-token context window. Moonshot says its Stable LatentMoE design effectively activates 16 of 896 experts. Kimi Delta Attention processes long sequences more efficiently, according to the company, while Attention Residuals retrieves representations from different depths. Moonshot puts the resulting gain in overall scaling efficiency at about 2.5 times that of Kimi K2. Outside researchers had no released K3 weights to test the measure on launch day.
For inference, Moonshot recommends supernode configurations with at least 64 accelerators. According to the launch post, the company began quantization-aware training at the supervised fine-tuning stage, using MXFP4 weights and MXFP8 activations for broader hardware compatibility. Kimi Delta Attention complicates conventional prefix caching, Moonshot notes, and the company plans to release a corresponding vLLM implementation with the model.
Moonshot’s benchmark table
Moonshot’s vendor-run table presents K3 as competitive with proprietary rivals. It reports a score of 88.3 on Terminal Bench 2.1 and 81.2 on FrontierSWE. Different agent harnesses limit direct model-to-model comparisons: the notes list KimiCode, Claude Code and Codex, depending on the benchmark. They add that some Claude Fable 5 results may include fallback to Claude Opus 4.8. The launch material did not provide a mature independent K3 benchmark using one controlled setup.
Moonshot’s vendor-run benchmark comparison. Source: Moonshot AI, “Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence”.
Moonshot warns that K3 may become highly unstable when agent software fails to return the model’s full prior reasoning. It also cautions that ambiguous tasks can prompt unexpected decisions and recommends explicit behavioral constraints for bounded applications.
Moonshot’s internal knowledge-work evaluation. Source: Moonshot AI, “Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence”.
Get Implicator.ai in your inbox
Strategic AI news from San Francisco. No hype, no "AI will change everything" throat clearing. Just what moved, who won, and why it matters. Daily at 6am PST.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Moonshot’s launch post acknowledges that K3’s overall user experience trails Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol, while presenting benchmark scores that put K3 near those systems on several coding and agent tests.
TestingCatalog and HCPTangHY test K3
On one universe-simulation prompt before the release, TestingCatalog compared Claude Fable 5 with an anonymized Arena checkpoint believed to be K3. Fable 5 finished faster and produced sturdier interface components, according to the publication. The likely K3 checkpoint made the more elaborate visual build, including a first-person camera view around a selected planet. TestingCatalog also reported long runtimes on difficult agent tasks. The anonymized, pre-release comparison does not establish the final model’s performance.
Know someone who'd find this useful? ✉️ Email it to a friend in one click, or they can subscribe free here.
After testing the released build, the account HCPTangHY posted observations on Linux.do describing few severe bugs and strong coding ability. The post judged K3 less polished than frontier systems and said reasoning runs above 1,000 seconds were common. HCPTangHY also reported that K3 performed at least as well as Opus 4.6 in the account’s bot environment. The findings came from one developer’s setup and are not a representative performance measurement.
Moonshot sets API prices
Moonshot prices cache-hit input at $0.30 per million tokens. Cache-miss input costs $3 per million tokens, and output costs $15 per million. The company is serving K3 through Kimi.com, Kimi Work, Kimi Code and the Kimi API, with maximum thinking effort enabled by default at launch. Low- and high-effort modes will arrive in later updates, Moonshot says. The company also claims an API cache-hit rate above 90% in coding workloads, a workload-specific figure that has not been independently verified.
Moonshot’s Kimi K3 showcase graphic. Source: Moonshot AI, “Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence”.
The full weights are due July 27. Moonshot plans a technical report with additional details on K3’s architecture, training and evaluations, but has not set a publication date. Until the weights arrive, outside researchers cannot examine the model directly or run it under independently controlled setups.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kimi K3 available as an open-weight model now?
Not yet. Moonshot launched hosted access through Kimi.com, Kimi Work, Kimi Code and its API on July 16. The company says it will publish the full model weights by July 27.
How large is Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 has 2.8 trillion total parameters. Its sparse Stable LatentMoE architecture activates 16 of 896 experts, according to Moonshot, so only part of the model runs for each token.
What context window does Kimi K3 support?
Moonshot specifies a one-million-token context window and native vision. The model also uses Kimi Delta Attention, which the company designed to process long sequences more efficiently.
Can Moonshot’s Kimi K3 benchmark claims be compared directly with rivals?
Only cautiously. Moonshot used different agent harnesses across tests, including KimiCode, Claude Code and Codex. Full weights were unavailable on launch day, preventing outside researchers from running the model in independently controlled setups.
How much does the Kimi K3 API cost?
Moonshot charges $0.30 per million cache-hit input tokens, $3 per million cache-miss input tokens and $15 per million output tokens. Its claimed cache-hit rate above 90% applies specifically to coding workloads and remains unverified.
AI-generated summary, reviewed by an editor. More on our AI guidelines.



IMPLICATOR