Cursor just paid a premium for a code review startup to fix what it calls the new bottleneck in software development. But a July 2025 study using Cursor's own tools found AI made experienced developers 19% slower. The math gets uncomfortable from there.
China's EUV prototype isn't a technological defeat for the West. It's a counterintelligence one. The vector isn't smuggled crates. It's people. Europe discovered, again, that openness without defense is vulnerability, not virtue.
Chinese scientists built a working EUV prototype using former ASML engineers and secondary-market parts. The machine generates light but hasn't produced chips. ASML took 18 years from prototype to production. Beijing wants 3-5. The math doesn't add up.
OpenAI’s latest innovation replicates Ghibli-style animation, sparking legal concerns. Discover the ramifications for AI and copyright law.
OpenAI's new image generator transforms anything into Studio Ghibli's iconic style. Users raced to recreate everything from wedding photos to historical tragedies. The results look disturbingly authentic.
The feature sparked an instant viral craze. Pet owners morphed their cats into anime stars. Couples reimagined their portraits with Ghibli's signature warmth. Then things got weird. Users started Ghibli-fying the Twin Towers on 9/11 and JFK's assassination.
Even OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman joined the party. He swapped his profile picture for a Ghibli version and encouraged followers to make more. The irony? Studio Ghibli's founder Hayao Miyazaki once called AI art "an insult to life itself."
OpenAI claims its guidelines prevent copying living artists' styles. Yet Miyazaki remains very much alive. The company's workaround? They allow "broader studio styles" while blocking individual artists.
Legal experts watch closely. Copyright law doesn't protect artistic style, but OpenAI's perfect Ghibli mimicry suggests extensive training on their work. Similar issues fuel The New York Times' ongoing lawsuit against the company.
Users keep pushing boundaries. They've recreated everything from Hitler in Paris to Mark Zuckerberg's congressional testimony. OpenAI's response? A swift policy change blocking direct requests for public figures. The platform now refuses to generate images of celebrities or cartoon characters.
The trend expanded beyond Ghibli. Users discovered the tool could copy Rick & Morty, The Simpsons, and other iconic styles. None of these studios have commented on their work being transformed without permission.
The controversy highlights a deeper problem. Tech companies rush to copy artistic styles without asking permission. They call it "innovation." Artists call it theft.
Consider the numbers. OpenAI's image generator processed over 10 million requests in its first week. Each request potentially copied someone's artistic style. The company pockets the profits. Artists get nothing.
Their legal defense? They claim AI "transforms" art into something new. Critics argue it just remixes existing work. The distinction matters. Copyright law protects against copying. It doesn't stop "transformation."
Meanwhile, smaller studios watch nervously. If OpenAI can copy Ghibli, what stops them from targeting independent artists? Some creators already report seeing their styles pop up in AI-generated art.
The timing couldn't be worse for OpenAI. They face mounting pressure over copyright issues. The New York Times lawsuit threatens their entire training model. Congress debates AI regulation. Now they've angered one of animation's most respected studios.
The company's response follows a familiar pattern. Launch first, apologize later. Block the most controversial uses. Hope everyone forgets. But this time might be different. Studio Ghibli commands massive respect in the art world. Their objections carry weight.
The incident exposes AI companies' core strategy: Move fast, copy art, and let the lawyers sort it out. It worked for tech giants during the social media boom. Whether it works for AI remains unclear.
Why this matters:
China's EUV prototype isn't a technological defeat for the West. It's a counterintelligence one. The vector isn't smuggled crates. It's people. Europe discovered, again, that openness without defense is vulnerability, not virtue.
The US Trade Representative named nine European companies as potential targets for restrictions. The demand: stop enforcing EU laws against American tech firms. This isn't a trade dispute. It's something else entirely.
The administration cut 317,000 federal workers. Now it wants 1,000 tech recruits from Palantir, Amazon, and Microsoft—who keep their stock while shaping government AI. The math is interesting. So are the conflicts of interest.
Trump signed an order claiming to preempt state AI laws. Constitutional problem: executive orders aren't laws. But the real story is who drafted it, and what they got in return. Nvidia's CEO now has a direct line to the Oval Office.
Get the 5-minute Silicon Valley AI briefing, every weekday morning — free.
