Impli reveals the exact APEX method professionals use to optimize AI prompts. The article shows the complete system specification—from analyzing requests to executing optimized prompts that work across all platforms.
Web scraping has quietly become the backbone of AI training data. But legal gray areas and sophisticated anti-blocking measures make success tricky. This guide reveals what works in 2025.
Sean Grove from OpenAI says coding is dead. Instead of writing code, developers should write specifications that generate software. AWS just launched Kiro to make this real, while GeneXus claims they've done it for 35 years
Trump's new AI plan promises deregulation for infrastructure but demands political neutrality from AI models. Companies seeking federal contracts must prove their systems aren't biased—a move that could slow US progress while China races ahead.
💡 TL;DR - The 30 Seconds Version
👉 Trump administration prepares executive order requiring AI companies with federal contracts to prove their models are politically neutral.
📊 David Sacks and Sriram Krishnan lead the effort with a 20-page plan targeting "woke AI" bias in systems like Google's Gemini.
🏭 Three executive orders expected by month's end cover AI infrastructure deregulation, chip exports, and political neutrality requirements.
🌍 Major players like Microsoft, Google, and Anthropic must adjust their AI development to secure government contracts worth billions.
🚀 Political constraints could slow US AI progress while Chinese firms advance without similar neutrality requirements.
The Trump administration is preparing a sweeping overhaul of how America approaches artificial intelligence. The plan combines deregulation promises with export controls and a direct attack on what officials call "woke AI."
At the center sits an executive order that would force AI companies with federal contracts to prove their models are politically neutral. The move targets perceived liberal bias in systems like Google's Gemini, which generated images of racially diverse Nazis and depicted George Washington as Black.
David Sacks, Trump's AI czar, and Sriram Krishnan, senior policy adviser for AI, are spearheading this effort. They've built a 20-page action plan that rewards companies for compliance while punishing those that don't.
Trump's first move focuses on getting government out of the way. The administration wants to speed up permits for data centers and expand energy production to power AI systems. Trump and Sacks showcased this approach in Pittsburgh earlier this week, celebrating billions in private investment.
Build faster, build bigger. That's the message. The plan cuts regulatory burdens and fixes permitting processes that officials say slow innovation. It appeals to an industry that constantly gripes about red tape.
This represents the carrot in the administration's approach. Companies that play ball on the culture war issues get a streamlined path to build infrastructure and expand operations.
The second pillar focuses on beating China in the global AI race. Another planned executive order would promote exports of U.S. chips and AI tools using organizations like the Export-Import Bank.
Sacks and Krishnan have already pushed to fast-track exports of high-performance chips from Nvidia to allied countries like the United Arab Emirates. The goal is ensuring friendly nations run on American AI rather than Chinese alternatives.
This isn't about domestic politics. It's about projecting American power and cornering the international market for the foundational technology of the next century.
The third and most controversial element targets "woke AI." The executive order would apply to any AI firm seeking federal contracts, including major players like Microsoft, Google, and Anthropic.
Companies would need to prove their models don't lean left. This could mean changing how they train systems or adding new filtering to catch biased outputs.
Trump has waged this fight before. He's already moved to eliminate diversity programs from federal agencies and companies that contract with the government. The AI order extends this campaign to artificial intelligence.
But neutrality isn't simple to define. People disagree about what counts as balanced versus biased. AI systems learn from internet data, and that data carries all sorts of perspectives and prejudices.
The executive order could inadvertently play favorites within the industry. Elon Musk's xAI has made being "anti-woke" a core selling point. Musk and Sacks are close friends and former colleagues, potentially giving xAI an advantage in government contracts.
However, xAI isn't immune to problems. Its Grok chatbot recently faced criticism for generating antisemitic content praising Hitler. Achieving true neutrality proves harder than political branding suggests.
On the other end sits Anthropic, launched by former OpenAI executives. The company hired officials from the Biden administration and opposed some Trump positions on chip exports. Sacks has openly criticized the company, making it a potential target.
Anthropic maintains its actions aren't politically motivated, but in this climate, perception can become reality. A company's perceived political leaning could become a business liability.
Silicon Valley will likely resist political constraints on AI development. Companies argue that forcing political neutrality could stifle innovation and create impossible standards for measuring bias.
The tech industry faces a split reality: a deregulated, pro-business environment for infrastructure and exports, but political policing for AI models themselves.
Making AI politically neutral brings technical and practical problems. Traditional discrimination cases have clear metrics. AI bias is subtle and depends on context. Companies might need teams of political auditors or new testing methods.
Trump's team hasn't said how they'll measure neutrality or what happens when companies violate the rules. These details matter for whether the order actually changes behavior or just creates more paperwork.
The plan faces several obstacles. A federal judge recently ruled that Trump's decision to revoke over $1 billion in NIH research grants targeting diversity-focused studies was unlawful. Legal challenges to AI political requirements seem likely.
Political constraints might also hurt U.S. competitiveness. American companies would navigate political requirements while Chinese AI firms advance without similar limits.
Coca-Cola and PepsiCo shifted their diversity strategies after Trump's earlier executive orders. The AI order would do the same for artificial intelligence, using the government's massive purchasing power to shape political ideology.
The three executive orders are expected to roll out by the end of the month, with Trump planning to speak about his AI "action plan" at that time.
Why this matters:
• The government is using federal contracts worth billions to shape political ideology in powerful new technology, setting a precedent for how politics influences AI development
• This creates tension between promoting innovation through deregulation while imposing political constraints that could slow American AI progress as China races ahead
Q: What exactly is "woke AI" and how would the government measure it?
A: The administration defines "woke AI" as systems showing liberal bias, like Google's Gemini depicting George Washington as Black or racially diverse Nazis. However, Trump's team hasn't specified how they'll measure neutrality or what metrics determine violations.
Q: How much money is at stake with these federal contracts?
A: While exact amounts aren't specified, federal AI contracts are worth billions. Since nearly all major tech companies want government business, this gives the executive order significant leverage over the entire industry.
Q: How would companies actually prove their AI systems are politically neutral?
A: The administration hasn't detailed the process. Companies might need to hire political auditors, develop new testing methods, or implement filtering systems to catch biased outputs before they reach users.
Q: What penalties would companies face for violating neutrality requirements?
A: The administration hasn't announced specific penalties. Companies could potentially lose federal contracts worth billions, but exact consequences for producing biased AI outputs remain unclear.
Q: Why is Anthropic specifically being targeted by the administration?
A: Anthropic hired several Biden administration officials and opposed Trump positions on chip exports and AI regulations. AI czar David Sacks has openly criticized the company, making it a potential target.
Q: When will these executive orders take effect?
A: The three executive orders are expected to roll out by the end of July 2025. Trump plans to speak about his AI "action plan" when they're released.
Q: Could this slow U.S. AI development compared to China?
A: Yes. While American companies navigate political requirements and potential contract losses, Chinese AI firms could advance faster without similar neutrality constraints, potentially giving them a competitive advantage.
Q: What are the technical challenges of removing bias from AI systems?
A: AI systems learn from internet data containing various biases. Unlike traditional discrimination cases with clear metrics, AI bias can be subtle and context-dependent, making it difficult to identify and remove.
Washington blinked first. After trying to choke China's AI ambitions with chip bans, the U.S. reversed course in July 2025. The reason? Beijing's $98 billion AI bet was working—Chinese startups were matching Silicon Valley with a fraction of the resources.
Microsoft used Chinese engineers to maintain Pentagon's most sensitive systems for nearly a decade. Top Defense officials had no idea. A ProPublica investigation reveals the $18-an-hour workaround exposing military secrets.
Trump reverses China chip ban after Nvidia CEO's White House visit. The $15 billion policy flip shows economic interests beating security concerns in the AI race with Beijing.
Pentagon awards $200M AI contracts to Google, OpenAI, Anthropic and Musk's xAI days after Grok chatbot called itself 'MechaHitler' and posted antisemitic rants. The timing raises questions about government oversight of AI systems.
Get the 5-minute Silicon Valley AI briefing, every weekday morning — free.
