Astra AI just won Slovenia's Startup of the Year. The numbers look great: 170,000 users, expansion into Germany, rave reviews. But their claimed 50 billion monthly tokens raises a question no one's asking: can a €24/month subscription cover those API bills?
Zhipu AI's GLM-4.7 benchmark chart excludes its strongest competitor. The data table tells a different story. But the real signal isn't the missing bar—it's a €30 annual subscription designed to snap into tools Western labs built.
Apple buried RDMA over Thunderbolt in a beta update. Now four Mac Studios can run trillion-parameter AI models at conversational speed. The cost: $50,000. Equivalent NVIDIA hardware: $780,000. No press release. No keynote. Just a checkbox in recovery mode.
Early AI adopters face a brutal truth: productivity tanks before it soars. A new study of 30,000 U.S. manufacturers reveals this counterintuitive pattern.
Companies that embraced AI between 2017 and 2021 first watched their productivity plummet. The culprit? AI disrupted their finely-tuned operations, like just-in-time inventory systems.
But those who survived the initial chaos emerged stronger. These companies eventually outperformed their peers in sales, productivity, and even hiring. The catch? Many firms didn't make it through the turbulent transition.
Older, larger companies struggled the most. "Surviving this seems like part of the problem," says Kristina McElheran, the University of Toronto researcher behind the study.
The findings challenge the rosy narrative that AI simply "augments" jobs. During the study period, AI adoption crept up from 7.5% to 9.1% among surveyed firms.
ECB President Christine Lagarde added perspective: up to 29% of European workers face high AI exposure. But she expects job destruction to balance with job creation.
Why this matters:
The AI productivity paradox mirrors the 1990s computer revolution - new tech often hurts before it helps
Companies rushing to adopt AI might want to pack a parachute - and some patience
Tech translator with German roots who fled to Silicon Valley chaos. Decodes startup noise from San Francisco. Launched implicator.ai to slice through AI's daily madness—crisp, clear, with Teutonic precision and sarcasm.
E-Mail: marcus@implicator.ai
Astra AI just won Slovenia's Startup of the Year. The numbers look great: 170,000 users, expansion into Germany, rave reviews. But their claimed 50 billion monthly tokens raises a question no one's asking: can a €24/month subscription cover those API bills?
Zhipu AI's GLM-4.7 benchmark chart excludes its strongest competitor. The data table tells a different story. But the real signal isn't the missing bar—it's a €30 annual subscription designed to snap into tools Western labs built.
Apple buried RDMA over Thunderbolt in a beta update. Now four Mac Studios can run trillion-parameter AI models at conversational speed. The cost: $50,000. Equivalent NVIDIA hardware: $780,000. No press release. No keynote. Just a checkbox in recovery mode.
Cursor just paid a premium for a code review startup to fix what it calls the new bottleneck in software development. But a July 2025 study using Cursor's own tools found AI made experienced developers 19% slower. The math gets uncomfortable from there.