Impli reveals the exact APEX method professionals use to optimize AI prompts. The article shows the complete system specification—from analyzing requests to executing optimized prompts that work across all platforms.
Web scraping has quietly become the backbone of AI training data. But legal gray areas and sophisticated anti-blocking measures make success tricky. This guide reveals what works in 2025.
Sean Grove from OpenAI says coding is dead. Instead of writing code, developers should write specifications that generate software. AWS just launched Kiro to make this real, while GeneXus claims they've done it for 35 years
While Congress debates TikTok's future, ByteDance quietly built America's #2 education app. Gauth helps 200 million students cheat on homework by solving problems from photos. Same company, same data concerns, zero scrutiny.
💡 TL;DR - The 30 Seconds Version
📱 ByteDance quietly built the #2 education app in America while everyone watched TikTok - Gauth helps students cheat on homework with 200 million users worldwide.
📊 Students snap photos of math problems and get instant AI solutions, backed by 50,000 human tutors when algorithms fail.
🏭 Launched in 2020 after China banned for-profit tutoring, forcing education companies to seek overseas growth from Singapore bases.
🔍 The app collects photo libraries, location data, and contacts from teenagers - same privacy concerns as TikTok, zero regulatory attention.
💰 Free model switches to freemium with $11.99 monthly subscriptions as ByteDance seeks revenue after years of subsidized growth.
🚨 Military families unknowingly share data through homework apps owned by Chinese companies, creating intelligence risks lawmakers haven't addressed.
While lawmakers debate TikTok's future, another ByteDance app sits comfortably at number two in America's education charts. Gauth solves homework problems for millions of students who simply snap photos of equations and get instant answers.
The app launched in 2020 as Gauthmath. Its creator, former math teacher Curry Z, wanted students to stop struggling with assignments. He got more than he bargained for. Within six months, over one million users had downloaded the free app. By 2024, Gauth claimed 200 million users worldwide.
Students upload photos of math problems. Gauth's AI provides step-by-step solutions in seconds. For trickier questions, human tutors jump in within minutes. The process feels seamless. The results speak for themselves.
Gauth operates through GauthTech, a Singapore-based subsidiary. But make no mistake - this is ByteDance's show. The same company facing congressional heat over TikTok quietly built one of America's most popular education apps.
The timing wasn't accidental. China cracked down on for-profit tutoring in 2021, pushing education companies overseas. Gauth rode that wave from its Singapore base, targeting global students instead of the restricted domestic market.
TikTok grabs headlines. Gauth grabs homework. Both collect similar data from similar age groups. Only one faces serious scrutiny.
Gauth's privacy policy reveals extensive data collection. The app accesses photo libraries, location information, contacts, and chat logs. Users must be 13 or older, placing most in high school.
This creates the same concerns that fuel TikTok criticism. Chinese companies must comply with national security laws requiring data sharing with authorities. A homework app becomes a potential intelligence tool.
The implications multiply when you consider military families. The Pentagon recently discovered that Tutor.com, used by military personnel, shares ownership ties with ByteDance through Chinese private equity. Suddenly, homework help looks like reconnaissance.
Gauth doesn't dominate alone. Photomath, acquired by Google in 2022, competes directly. Question.ai from Chinese startup Zuoyebang ranks closely in app downloads. The homework helper market has become a battleground between American and Chinese AI companies.
Each app offers similar features: photo recognition, step-by-step solutions, subject coverage beyond math. The real competition happens in accuracy, speed, and user experience. Gauth wins on convenience but occasionally provides wrong answers, according to user reviews.
Traditional players like Chegg struggle to match the mobile-first approach. Meanwhile, general AI tools like ChatGPT handle homework queries without specialized apps. Gauth must prove its focused approach beats generic solutions.
Gauth started free and stayed mostly free. ByteDance's deep pockets subsidized rapid growth without immediate revenue pressure. This gave Gauth competitive advantages smaller startups couldn't match.
Recently, Gauth introduced premium features through Gauth Plus subscriptions. Unlimited detailed explanations, priority tutor access, and expanded question libraries cost $11.99 monthly. The freemium model follows successful education apps but tests whether students will pay for homework help.
ByteDance hasn't disclosed Gauth's finances. Industry observers estimate the app would achieve unicorn valuation if independent. Instead, its worth remains tied to ByteDance's strategic value and long-term education ambitions.
Teachers and parents wrestle with Gauth's impact. Does instant homework help teach problem-solving or encourage academic shortcuts? The app promises step-by-step explanations that promote understanding. Critics argue students skip the struggle that builds mathematical thinking.
Gauth addresses concerns by emphasizing learning over answers. Solutions include reasoning and methodology, not just final numbers. The company stresses educational value and discourages pure answer-seeking.
The debate reflects broader AI tensions in education. Technology can democratize access to tutoring and personalized help. It can also undermine traditional learning processes that build critical thinking skills.
Gauth's success highlights inconsistent regulatory attention. TikTok faces potential bans while Gauth operates without similar scrutiny. Both apps collect extensive user data. Both serve young American audiences. Both answer to the same Chinese parent company.
The difference lies in visibility and perceived threat. TikTok's social features and algorithm-driven content raise propaganda concerns. Gauth's educational mission provides cover for similar data collection practices.
Security experts warn that homework apps represent overlooked intelligence risks. Student data reveals family information, location patterns, and personal details valuable for foreign intelligence operations. Academic settings provide windows into American society and government connections.
Gauth's future depends on balancing growth, profitability, and regulatory pressure. The app must convert free users to paid subscribers while maintaining competitive advantages. Geopolitical tensions could bring unwanted attention similar to TikTok's challenges.
ByteDance's support provides resources and technical expertise. It also creates liability if lawmakers expand Chinese app restrictions. Gauth's Singapore incorporation offers some protection but won't shield against broader ByteDance scrutiny.
The education technology market continues evolving rapidly. Gauth competes against improving general AI tools, established education companies, and new startup entrants. Success requires constant innovation in features, accuracy, and user experience.
Educational institutions may eventually restrict homework helper apps entirely. Academic integrity concerns could prompt policy changes that limit Gauth's school-age audience. The company must demonstrate legitimate educational value to survive potential restrictions.
Why this matters:
Q: How much does Gauth cost?
A: Gauth's basic features are free. The premium subscription, Gauth Plus, costs $11.99 per month or $31.99 quarterly. This includes unlimited detailed explanations, priority tutor access, and an ad-free experience.
Q: Who founded Gauth and when?
A: Former math teacher Curry Z founded Gauthmath in 2020, launching it as a ByteDance subsidiary. The app officially rolled out globally in late 2020 and reached one million users within six months.
Q: What subjects does Gauth cover besides math?
A: Gauth helps with calculus, chemistry, biology, physics, social science, and essay writing. The app provides step-by-step solutions for STEM subjects and can generate essays or check grammar for writing assignments.
Q: How accurate are Gauth's answers?
A: Gauth works well for simple to moderately complex problems but can struggle with advanced questions. User reviews mention occasional wrong answers. The company claims all solutions are checked by both AI and human tutors before delivery.
Q: Does Gauth have human tutors or just AI?
A: Gauth uses both. The AI handles straightforward problems instantly. For complex questions, the app connects students with live human tutors who typically respond within minutes. The company claims to have 50,000 verified expert tutors.
Q: How many students use Gauth?
A: Gauth claims 200 million users worldwide as of 2024. The app has been downloaded over 50 million times on Android alone and ranks as the #2 education app in the U.S. App Store.
Q: What data does Gauth collect from users?
A: Gauth accesses photo libraries, location information, contacts, chat logs, and user content like homework photos. The app requires users to be 13 or older and stores data that could be subject to Chinese national security laws.
Q: Who are Gauth's main competitors?
A: Google-owned Photomath is the biggest rival, along with Question.ai from Chinese company Zuoyebang. Traditional players include Chegg's Mathway and Symbolab, while general AI tools like ChatGPT also compete for homework help queries.
Robert Brown
Chinese startup Moonshot AI released Kimi K2, an open-source model that matches GPT-4.1 performance while costing five times less. Silicon Valley's response? OpenAI delayed their planned open-source release hours after K2 launched.
Grammarly bought email app Superhuman for an undisclosed sum, part of its plan to build an AI productivity empire. With $1 billion in fresh funding, the grammar company wants to put AI agents at the center of your workday.
Programming computers in English sounds impossible. But Andrej Karpathy built working apps without knowing code, using only natural language prompts. He calls it Software 3.0. These AI systems think like humans, complete with superhuman memory and distinctly human mistakes.
Chinese AI startup MiniMax just trained a frontier model for $534,700 - a fraction of what competitors spend. Their open-source M1 beats DeepSeek while using 75% less computing power. The breakthrough suggests advanced AI no longer requires massive budgets.
Get the 5-minute Silicon Valley AI briefing, every weekday morning — free.
