Trump approved Nvidia's H200 chip sales to China with a 25% government cut. One problem: Beijing already rejected weaker chips over security concerns. The deal could be a political win that generates zero revenue.
Google's AI Mode doesn't match ads to keywords anymore. It reads its own AI-generated answers and decides what you meant to ask. Two decades of SEO expertise just became obsolete. The advertising industry hasn't noticed yet.
OpenAI claims ChatGPT saves workers an hour daily. MIT found most AI deployments return zero value. Harvard researchers coined "workslop" for AI output that looks professional but advances nothing. Whose data should enterprises trust?
In an unprecedented AI showdown, five leading chatbots tackle one of tech's most controversial questions: Is Elon Musk steering towards fascism?
SAN FRANCISCO, Feb 20 - In a fascinating display of artificial intelligence diversity, five leading AI chatbots have analyzed whether Elon Musk exhibits fascist tendencies. Their conclusions? Well, let's just say they're about as aligned as Musk's Cybertruck panels.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet takes the diplomatic approach of a Silicon Valley PR team during a crisis. It carefully sidesteps the direct question, stating it prefers to "focus on verified facts and actions rather than applying loaded labels." In the world of AI responses, this is the equivalent of saying "let's circle back on that" in a corporate meeting.
The contrast in other AI responses is striking. While French Mistral AI takes a stance shorter than a Tesla's 0-60 time, declaring flatly that "Elon Musk is not a fascist," other AIs craft analyses longer than a SpaceX rocket's trajectory. Grok 3 beta, perhaps channeling its creator's verbose tweeting style, delivers a comprehensive analysis that could rival the length of a Tesla shareholder meeting.
A key point of contention among the AIs is Musk's controversial gesture at Trump's 2025 inauguration. ChatGPT 4o notes that this "drew widespread condemnation from political figures and organizations worldwide," while Deepseek provides more context, mentioning that "neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups celebrated the act, interpreting it as validation."
Grok 3 beta - Musk's own AI Chatbot - brings specific allegations to the table, claiming Musk spent "over $250 million to influence the 2024 U.S. election in Trump's favor." It also mentions his appointment as head of the "Department of Government Efficiency" - a position that sounds about as real as a profitable Twitter purchase.
Multiple AIs highlight Musk's interactions with European far-right movements. As Grok 3 beta reports, Musk called Germany's AfD "the last spark of hope" for the country in a December 2024 op-ed. One might say he's collecting controversial European political connections like Tesla collects government subsidies.
The AIs diverge significantly in their analytical approaches. Chinese Deepseek AI engine takes an academic stance, noting that "experts caution against labeling him a Nazi," while citing historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat's interpretation of his actions as "part of a broader normalization of authoritarianism."
Grok 3 beta points out a curious contradiction in Musk's X management: "Musk has reinstated accounts of known far-right figures... while critics point out he's also suppressed left-leaning voices." It seems his definition of free speech might be as flexible as Tesla's delivery estimates.
Mistral AI stands alone in its unequivocal defense of Musk, stating that his actions "do not align with the ideology of fascism."
Why this matters:
Read on, my dear:
The Ultimate Guide to AI Tools in 2025: Boosting Productivity for Beginners and Professionals
Google's AI Mode doesn't match ads to keywords anymore. It reads its own AI-generated answers and decides what you meant to ask. Two decades of SEO expertise just became obsolete. The advertising industry hasn't noticed yet.
OpenAI claims ChatGPT saves workers an hour daily. MIT found most AI deployments return zero value. Harvard researchers coined "workslop" for AI output that looks professional but advances nothing. Whose data should enterprises trust?
Tim Cook built Apple's leadership into a monument of stability. In 2025, that monument cracked. Meta poached AI and design chiefs with $25M packages. The chip architect may follow. What broke inside the world's most valuable company?
The New York Times sued Perplexity for copyright infringement—months after signing an AI licensing deal with Amazon. Perplexity built revenue-sharing programs for publishers. The Times declined to join any of them. Now lawyers are involved.
Get the 5-minute Silicon Valley AI briefing, every weekday morning — free.
