UC Berkeley researchers discovered AI models can teach themselves complex reasoning by monitoring their own confidence levels—no human feedback or answer keys required. The implications reach far beyond the lab.
Sam Altman makes money from AI bots flooding the internet. Now he wants to scan your eyeballs to prove you're human. His eye-scanning Orbs launched in six US cities, paying $40 in crypto for iris scans. But there's a catch with the "privacy protection" claims.
Good Morning from San Francisco, Altman's latest venture asks Americans to stare into an orb for $42 in
Researchers have found a way to make AI solve complex problems using just one-fifth of its usual computing power. The method could help bring advanced AI capabilities to ordinary computers - reducing both cost and energy use.
Researchers have developed a way to make AI language models reason more efficiently - like teaching a verbose friend to get to the point without losing their smarts.
The new method, called Learning to Think (L2T), helps large language models solve complex problems while using up to 80% less computational power. It's the AI equivalent of replacing a long-winded explanation with a concise, accurate answer.
The breakthrough comes from researchers at the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Their work tackles a persistent problem in AI: language models often think like students padding an essay to reach a word count - using far more steps than necessary to reach a conclusion.
Current AI models excel at complex tasks but tend to ramble, generating unnecessarily long chains of reasoning that waste computational resources. Imagine asking someone for directions and getting a detailed history of city planning along with your route. That's how many AI models work today.
L2T fixes this by teaching models to value efficiency. It breaks down reasoning into smaller steps and rewards the model for each useful insight while penalizing computational waste. Think of it as training a chess player to find the winning move quickly instead of examining every possible option.
The system uses information theory - a branch of mathematics that deals with data and uncertainty - to measure how much each reasoning step actually contributes to solving the problem. It's like having a teacher who grades not just the final answer but how efficiently the student arrived at it.
The researchers tested L2T on various challenges, from complex mathematical problems to coding tasks. The results showed that models trained with L2T matched or exceeded the accuracy of traditional methods while using significantly fewer computational resources.
For example, when solving advanced math problems, a model using L2T needed only half the computational steps to achieve the same accuracy as conventional methods. On simpler tasks, it learned to be even more efficient, cutting unnecessary steps entirely.
This efficiency gain matters because computational resources - the processing power and energy needed to run AI models - aren't infinite or free. Every extra step an AI takes consumes more resources and time.
The improvement is particularly notable because it works across different types and sizes of language models. Whether working with smaller models or larger ones, L2T consistently helped them reason more efficiently without sacrificing accuracy.
This advancement could help make advanced AI more accessible and practical. Just as we prefer colleagues who can explain complex ideas clearly and concisely, L2T helps AI models communicate more efficiently.
The researchers also found that L2T helped models adapt their reasoning approach based on the difficulty of the task. For simple problems, it learned to give quick, direct answers. For complex ones, it used more detailed reasoning - but still without the computational equivalent of clearing its throat fifty times before speaking.
The method achieves this by treating each reasoning task as a series of episodes, like chapters in a book. Instead of waiting until the end to determine if the reasoning was good, it evaluates the usefulness of each episode as it occurs. This ongoing feedback helps the model learn when to elaborate and when to conclude.
Looking ahead, this research could influence how we train future AI systems. As models become more powerful, teaching them to use resources efficiently becomes increasingly important. It's the difference between having a brilliant but long-winded advisor and one who gives you exactly the guidance you need.
Why this matters:
Read on, my dear:
UC Berkeley researchers discovered AI models can teach themselves complex reasoning by monitoring their own confidence levels—no human feedback or answer keys required. The implications reach far beyond the lab.
Why do AI systems perform worse when they think harder about visual tasks? New research shows GUI agents achieve better accuracy by skipping reasoning steps that help language models excel.
A surprising new study reveals that when AI models stop to think, they actually get worse at following basic instructions.
When asked how they reach decisions, advanced AI systems write elaborate explanations—but new research reveals these justifications are often fabricated, raising critical questions about current safety measures.
Get tomorrow's intel today. Join the clever kids' club. Free forever.
