Impli reveals the exact APEX method professionals use to optimize AI prompts. The article shows the complete system specification—from analyzing requests to executing optimized prompts that work across all platforms.
Web scraping has quietly become the backbone of AI training data. But legal gray areas and sophisticated anti-blocking measures make success tricky. This guide reveals what works in 2025.
Sean Grove from OpenAI says coding is dead. Instead of writing code, developers should write specifications that generate software. AWS just launched Kiro to make this real, while GeneXus claims they've done it for 35 years
AI knows all the right answers. That's the problem, says Hugging Face co-founder Thomas Wolf. Wolf argues that today's AI models ace tests but can't think like scientists. They've memorized human knowledge but can't question it. This flaw could slow scientific progress.
He speaks from experience. Wolf went from top student to MIT researcher, where he learned that getting perfect grades didn't help him discover new ideas. "I was good at predicting exam questions but hit a wall with original research," he writes.
History backs this up. Einstein failed his entrance exam. Teachers called Edison "addled." Critics dismissed Nobel winner Barbara McClintock's "weird thinking." Breaking scientific ground often means breaking academic rules.
AI companies test their models on complex questions with clear answers. But science moves forward through questions that challenge accepted facts. Think of Copernicus arguing that Earth orbits the Sun when everyone believed otherwise.
Current AI models work like perfect students who never question the textbook. They connect existing facts but don't ask why those facts might be wrong. OpenAI's Sam Altman promises these systems will speed up scientific discovery. Wolf disagrees.
Real breakthroughs come from asking "What if everyone is wrong?" That's how Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier turned bacterial defense systems into gene-editing tools, winning a Nobel Prize.
The tech industry has built helpful digital assistants that never challenge authority. But science needs rebels who question everything - including their own training.
Wolf suggests new ways to measure AI progress. Stop testing how well systems follow rules. Start testing how they:
🔄 Question their own training data and spot flaws in what they've learned
🚀 Make wild proposals that challenge current thinking
🔍 Spot tiny patterns others miss and connect unexpected dots
❓ Ask the kind of questions that make scientists say "Huh, I never thought of that"
"We need a B student who sees what everyone else missed," Wolf says. Not an A+ student who knows all the right answers.
The solution? Build systems that think differently, not perfectly.
Why this matters:
Science advances when someone questions accepted facts
Perfect recall won't help if you're memorizing the wrong things
Tech translator with German roots who fled to Silicon Valley chaos. Decodes startup noise from San Francisco. Launched implicator.ai to slice through AI's daily madness—crisp, clear, with Teutonic precision and deadly sarcasm.
AI companies abandon rivalry to warn: our window to understand AI reasoning is closing. Models currently 'think out loud' for complex tasks, revealing plans to misbehave. But this transparency could vanish as technology advances.
Disney Research addresses a major problem with digital humans: they look fake up close. New ScaffoldAvatar system renders photorealistic 3D head avatars with individual freckles and wrinkles at 100+ FPS on consumer hardware.
Two-thirds of UK children now use AI chatbots for emotional support, with vulnerable kids forming deep bonds with systems that lack empathy. Age checks fail, content filters break, and some kids pay the ultimate price.
Experienced developers work 19% slower with AI coding tools but think they're 20% faster. New study challenges AI's flagship use case and shows why self-reported productivity gains can't be trusted.