Microsoft cuts 9,000 jobs including 200 at Candy Crush maker King, marking the fourth Xbox layoff round in 18 months. Despite record gaming engagement, the $69 billion Activision deal pressures studios to prove profitability over creativity.
Meta offered AI researchers $300 million packages to join its new lab. Every single person said no. The rejections reveal how top talent values mission over money in the race to build artificial intelligence.
Even the most advanced AI visual systems have a serious problem: They try to answer questions they can't actually solve. A new study from the University of Tokyo and their collaborators tested leading AI models on what seems like a simple task - knowing when to say "I can't answer that."
The results revealed a concerning gap between what these systems claim to understand and what they truly comprehend. The researchers created three types of impossible questions. They removed correct answers from multiple choice options, showed images that had nothing to do with the questions being asked, or provided completely irrelevant answer choices. A reliable AI system should recognize these situations and decline to answer.
But that's not what happened. While these same AI models score impressively on standard tests, they performed dismally when faced with impossible questions. Many open-source models got scores below 6% when they should have said "I can't answer this."
Credit: The University of Tokyo
The gap between closed-source models (like GPT-4 Vision) and open-source alternatives proved particularly stark. While GPT-4 Vision managed to identify unsolvable questions about 60% of the time, popular open-source models like CogVLM2 scored below 1% - despite both performing similarly well on standard tests.
"This suggests that our community's efforts to improve performance on existing benchmarks do not directly contribute to enhancing model reliability," the researchers note. In other words, we've been teaching AI to guess even when it shouldn't.
The study uncovers different failure patterns among models. Some struggle specifically with visual tasks, while others have trouble with basic reasoning about whether questions are answerable. The researchers found that adding explicit instructions to consider whether questions were impossible helped some models but made others perform worse.
Looking ahead, the team suggests that future AI development needs to focus not just on getting right answers, but on knowing when getting an answer isn't possible.
Why this matters:
Current AI visual systems are overconfident - they'll try to answer questions even when they can't possibly know the answer
We need new ways to measure AI reliability beyond just accuracy scores on standard tests
AI models ace standardized tests but fail basic tasks humans handle easily. New MIT research reveals "Potemkin understanding" - when AI correctly answers benchmark questions but shows no real grasp of concepts. 🤖📚
Anthropic launches research program to study AI's job impact after CEO predicts 50% of white-collar roles will vanish in 5 years. New data shows coding work already transforming as AI agents automate 79% of developer tasks.
New research reveals most people don't use AI for therapy—yet. Only 2.9% of Claude conversations involve emotional support, but the longest sessions hint at deeper connections ahead as AI capabilities grow.
MIT researchers monitored students' brains while they wrote essays with ChatGPT. The AI users showed weaker neural activity and couldn't quote their own work. When they switched back to writing alone, their brains stayed weakened.